Food production chains are only as “responsible” as their poorest link
We visited a shrimp farm today and it was my first experience seeing and understanding how farm workers can be accommodated. After stopping to watch a man feed the shrimp in a small boat, we approached a small hut on the side of the pond. I found myself hoping that this hut was a storage shed for materials used on the farm. However, I soon noticed that there was a woman with a baby sitting at the doorway and pictures of the Thai King (very common in Thai homes) posted on the walls inside. At that point I knew I was mistaken and that this was the home for the family of the man feeding the shrimp. While, of course, one can argue that a North American’s sense of minimum living requirements are exaggerated, I viewed this home as insufficient for the needs of this family.
I realized I was looking at the end rung of the supply chain for industrial shrimp. As the western world increases its interest and purchases of responsible products, a good indicator of whether or not this is making any difference will be if this family’s home improves. In other words, “responsible” supply chains are only as good as their poorest link.
While one might want to point the finger at the farm owner, I think it is important to realize that anyone who benefits from or uses a supply chain is part of the problem and is, therefore, responsible for finding a solution. In the west we are fond of pointing the finger at the developing world and blaming overpopulation for these types of problems, but this only allows us to avoid our own responsibility and allows the problem to continue. A basic requirement of a responsible world means that our industrial production systems function such that everyone who is involved in the supply chain is taken care of to a minimum acceptable social standard. This may mean paying higher prices for certain food products in the western world, but such price increases are, in reality, just reflecting the real cost of responsible food production.